Are Personal Budgets For People With Learning Disabilities An Ideal Vision Or A Concrete Reality?

United Response strongly supports personal budgets and provides opportunities for people in need to live more independently in the way they choose. However, that doesn't mean it's unrealistic. Sue Sayer, the company's chief executive, wrote in the Guardian in April 2011 that personal budgets "are not being executed as quickly and evenly as they should be." 

That's why Sue was delighted to accept the invitation to speak at a recent Office of Public Management (OPM) seminar in London alongside Bill Mumford, Executive Director of the Voluntary Organization Disability Group (VODG). It was. Participants discussed whether voluntary support and personal budgets would become the norm within five years. Mr. Hsu said there were still many significant hurdles and an outcome like this was unlikely, but he was hopeful it would be proven wrong.

Bill and Su are currently writing a joint blog about the seminar, available on the VODG blog. This provides food for thought about the future of personalization. After elaborating on the benefits of personal budgeting, we will analyze some of the obstacles below.

In discussion, he identified four major obstacles that could derail autonomous plans.

The pace of change: 15 years since the government introduced direct payments, only a third of the 1.7 million people on welfare still have a personal budget. 

The Postcode Lottery: The extent to which you have access to your personal budget varies depending on where you live, making it a confusing and complex situation for potential purchasers of services.

Fear and confusion among service users and families: Most councils do not make it easy for people to understand their personal budget. Buyer expertise is key. 

Spending cuts: Local authorities are cutting spending significantly, creating further barriers to greater choice and control.

The report notes that from a service provider's perspective, smaller organizations may struggle to allocate personal budgets, and that on the other side of the commissioning boundary, Congress, under enormous funding pressures, may not be able to take action. was unlikely to be a top priority. One participant commented, "We're all shutting down and withdrawing. This is not an environment conducive to change." The debate will bring together policymakers, academics, practitioners, and commissioners. When addressed to an audience that included me, there was a strong sense that it was not personal. The budget agenda remains focused on services, not people. The seminar said service providers and commissioners should think about outcomes, not money.

Housing was also mentioned as a support service, but this is not necessarily considered part of a person-centered approach. It was highlighted that volunteers are too often overlooked in terms of their supporting role in personalization. Similarly, participants were reminded that peer support and user-led organizations cannot be allowed to go out of business.

However, despite differing views on the likelihood that voluntary support will become the norm in the coming years, there are concerns that the initiative will only improve the quality of life for society's most vulnerable people. There was a clear consensus.

Article Source: https://boostarticles.com

Join Us: https://boostarticles.com/signup